The Paraclete is not the Holy Spirit


Free Online Articles Directory




Why Submit Articles?
Top Authors
Top Articles
FAQ
ABAnswers

Publish Article

0 && $.browser.msie ) {
var ie_version = parseInt($.browser.version);
if(ie_version Login


Login via


Register
Hello
My Home
Sign Out

Email

Password


Remember me?
Lost Password?

Home Page > Spirituality > Religion > The Paraclete is not the Holy Spirit

The Paraclete is not the Holy Spirit

Edit Article |

Posted: Feb 12, 2011 |Comments: 0
|



]]>

In this article we can now discuss the famous “Paraclete” of the Fourth Gospel. Jesus Christ, like John the Baptist, announced the advent of the Kingdom of God, invited the people to repentance, and baptized them for the remission of their sins. He honorably accomplished his mission, and faithfully delivered the message of God to the people of Israel. He was not himself the founder of the Kingdom of God, but only its herald, and that is why he wrote nothing and authorized no one to write the Holy Gospel that was inscribed in his mind. He revealed the Gospel which meant the “good news” concerning the “Kingdom of God” and the “Pereiklitos” to his followers, not in writing, but in oral discourses, and in public sermons. These discourses sermons, and parables were transmitted by those who had heard them to those who had not.

Later on it was that the sayings and teachings of the Master were reduced to writing. Jesus was no longer the Rabbi, but the Logos – the Divine Word; no longer the Forerunner of the Paraclete but his very Lord and Superior. His pure and true words were adulterated and mixed with myth and legend. For a time he was expected at any moment to come down from the clouds with legions of angels. The Apostles had all passed away; the second coming of Jesus Christ was delayed. His person and doctrine gave rise to a variety of religious and philosophical speculations. Sects succeeded one another; Gospels and Epistles under different names and titles appeared in many centers; and a multitude of the Christian scholars and apologists combated and criticized each other’s theory. If there had been written a Gospel during the lifetime of Jesus, or even a book authorized by the College of the Apostles, the teachings of the Prophet of Nazareth would have preserved their purity and integrity until the appearance of the Periqlit – Ahmad. But such was not the case. Each writer took a different view about the Master and his religion, and described him in his book – which he named Gospel or Epistle – according to his own imagination. The high-soaring flight of thought concerning the Word; the prophecy about the Periqlit; the inexplicable discourse of Jesus upon his flesh and blood; and a series of several miracles, events, and sayings recorded in the Fourth Gospel were unknown to the Synoptics and consequently to a great majority of the Christians who had not seen it at least for a couple of centuries.

The Fourth Gospel, too, like every other book of the New Testament, was written in Greek and not in Aramaic, which was the mother-tongue of Jesus and his disciples. Consequently, we are again confronted with the same difficulty which we met with when we were discussing the “Eudokia” of St. Luke, namely: What word or name was it that Jesus used in his native tongue to express that which the Fourth Gospel has translated as “the Paraclete” and which has been converted into “comforter” in all the versions of that Gospel?

Before discussing the etymology and the true signification of this unclassical or rather corrupt form of the Paraclete it is necessary to make a brief observation upon one particular feature of St. John’s Gospel. The authorship and authenticity of this Gospel are questions which concern the Higher Biblical Criticism; but it is impossible to believe that the Apostle could have written this book as we have it in its present shape and contents. The author, whether Yohannan (John) the son of Zebedee, or someone else under that name, seems to be familiar with the doctrine of the celebrated Jewish scholar and philosopher Philon concerning the Logos (Word). It is well known that the conquest of Palestine and the foundation of Alexandria by Alexander the Great opened up, for the first time, a new epoch for culture and civilization. It was then that the disciples of Moses met with those of Epicurus, and the mighty impact of the spiritual doctrines of the Bible on the materialism of the Greek paganism took place. The Greek art and philosophy began to be admired and studied by the Jewish doctors of the law both in Palestine and in Egypt, where they had a very numerous community. The penetration of the Greek thought and belles-lettres into the Jewish schools alarmed their priests and learned men. In fact, Hebrew was so much neglected that the Scriptures were read in the Alexandrian Synagogues in the Septuagint Version. This invasion by a foreign knowledge, however, moved the Jews to make a better study of their own law, and to defend it against the inauspicious new spirit. They endeavored, therefore, to find a new method for the interpretation of the Bible in order to enable the possibility of a “rapprochement” and reconciliation of the Biblical truths with the Hellenic thought. For their former method of a literal interpretation of the law was felt to be unworkable and too weak to stand against the fine reasoning of Plato and Aristotle. At the same time the solid activities of the Jews and their profound devotion to their religion often aroused against themselves the jealousy and hatred of the Greeks. Already, under Alexander the Great, an Egyptian priest, Manetho, had written libels or calumnies against Judaism. Under Tiberius, too, the great orator Apion had resuscitated and envenomed the insults of Manetho. So that this literature poisoned the people who, later on, cruelly persecuted the believers in the One true God.

The new method was accordingly found and adopted. It was an allegorical interpretation of every law, precept, narration and even the names of great personages were considered to conceal in them a secret idea which it attempted to bring to light. This allegorical interpretation soon arrogated to itself the place of the Bible, and was like an envelope enclosing in itself a system of religious philosophy.

Now the most prominent man who personified this science was Philon, who was born of a rich Jewish family in Alexandria in the year 25 before the Christian Era. Well versed in the philosophy of Plato, he wrote his allegorical work in a pure and harmonious Greek style. He believed that the doctrines of the Revelation could agree with the highest human knowledge and wisdom. What preoccupied his mind most was the phenomenon of the dealings of God, the pure Spirit, with the earthly beings. Following Plato’s theory of the “Ideas,” he invented a series of intermediary ideas called “the Emanations of the Divinity,” which he transformed into angles who unite God with the world. The fundamental substance of these ideas, the Logos (Word), constituted the supreme wisdom created in the world and the highest expression of the Providential action.

The Alexandrian School followed the triumph of Judaism over Paganism. “But,” as rightly remarks the Grand-Rabin Paul Haguenauer in his interesting little book Manuel de Litterature luive (p. 24). “mais d’elle surgirent, plus tard, des systemes nuisibles Li l’hebraisme” indeed noxious systems, not only to Judaism but to Christendom too!

The origin of the doctrine of the Logos is to be traced, therefore, to the theology of Philon, and the Apostle John – or the author of the Fourth Gospel, whoever he be – only dogmatized the theory of the “ideas” which had sprung up first from the golden brain of Plato. As remarked in the first article of this series, the Divine Word means the Word of God, and not God the Word. The word is an attribute of a rational being; it belongs to any speaker, but it is not the rational being, the speaker. The Divine Word is not eternal, it has an origin, a beginning; it did not exist before the beginning except potentially. The word is not the essence. It is a serious error to substantialize any attribute whatever. If it be permitted to say “God the Word,” why should it be prohibited to say, God the Mercy, God the Love, God the Vengeance, God the Life, God the Power, and so forth? I can well understand and accept the appellation of Jesus “the Spirit of Allah” (“Ruhu l-Lah”), of Moses “the Word of Allah” (“Kalamu ‘I-Lah”), of Muhammad “the Messenger of Allah” (“Rasul Allah”), meaning the Spirit of God, the Word of God, the Messenger of God respectively. But I can never understand nor accept that the Spirit, or the Word, or the Messenger, is a Divine Person having divine and human natures.

Now we will proceed to expose and confute the Christian error about the Paraclete. In this article I shall try to prove that the Paraclete is not, as the Christian Churches believe, the Holy Ghost, nor does it at all mean the “comforter” or the “intercessor;” and in the following article, please God, I shall clearly show that it is not “Paraclete” but “Periclyte” which precisely signifies “Ahmad” in the sense of “the most Illustrious, Praised, and Celebrated.”

1. THE HOLY SPIRIT IS DESCRIBED IN THE NEW TESTAMENT AS OTHERWISE THAN A PERSONALITY

A careful examination of the following passages in the New Testament will convince the readers that the Holy Spirit, not only is it not the third person of the Trinity, but is not even a distinct person. But the “Paraclete” foretold by Jesus Christ is a distinct person. This fundamental difference between the two is, therefore, a decisive argument against the hypothesis of their being one and the same person.

(a) In Luke xi. 13 the Holy Spirit is declared to be a “gift” of God. The contrast between the “good gifts” which are given by wicked parents and the Holy Spirit which is bestowed upon the believers by God entirely excludes the idea of any personality of the Spirit. Can we conscientiously and positively affirm that Jesus Christ, when he made the above contrast, meant to teach his hearers that “God the Father” makes a gift of “God the Holy Spirit” to His earthly “children”? Did he ever insinuate that he believed the third person of the Trinity to be a gift of the first person of the Trinity? Can we conscientiously admit that the Apostles believed this “gift” to be God the Almighty offered by God the Almighty to mortals? The very idea of such a belief makes a Muslim shudder.

(b) In 1 Cor. ii. 12 this Holy Spirit is described in the neuter gender “the Spirit from God”. Paul clearly states that as the Spirit which is in man makes him know the things that appertain to him so the Spirit of God makes a man know the things divine (1 Cor. 11). Consequently, the Holy Spirit here is not God but a divine issue, channel, or medium through which God teaches, enlightens, and inspire those whom He pleases. It is simply an action of God upon human soul and mind.

Just as the philosophy of Plato is not the Plato, and the Platonist Philon not the creator of that specific wisdom, so Peter was not God because of his enlightenment by the Spirit of God. Paul clearly sets forth, in the passage just quoted, that the human soul cannot discern the truths concerning God but only through His Spirit, inspiration, and direction.

(c) Again, in 1 Cor. vi. 19 we read that the righteous worshipers of God are called “the temple of the Holy Spirit” which they “received from God.” Here again the Spirit of God is not indicated to be a person or an angel, but His virtue, word, or power and religion. Both the body and the soul of a righteous believer are compared with a temple dedicated to the worship of the Eternal.

(d) In the Epistle to the Romans (viii. 9) this same spirit that “lives” within the believers is called alternately “the Spirit of God” and the “Spirit of Christ.” In this passage “the Spirit” means simply the faith and the true religion of God which Jesus proclaimed. Surely this spirit cannot mean to be the Christian ideal of the Holy Ghost, viz. another third of the three. We Muslims always wish and intend to regulate our lives and conduct ourselves in accordance with the spirit of Prophet Muhammad, meaning thereby that we are resolved to be faithful to the religion of Allah in much the same way as the Last Prophet was. For the holy Spirit in Prophet Muhammad, in Prophet Jesus, and in every other prophet was no other than the Spirit of Allah – praised be His Holy Name! This spirit is called “holy” to distinguish it from the impure and wicked spirit of the devil and his companions. This spirit is not a divine person, but a divine ray that enlightens and sanctifies the people of God.

(e) The Gospel formula, “In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,” even if authentic and truly prescribed by Christ, may be legitimately accepted as a formula of faith before the formal establishment of Islam, which is the real Kingdom of God upon earth. God Almighty in His quality of Creator is the Father of all beings, things, and intelligences, but not the Father of one particular son. The Orientalists know that the Semitic word “abb” or “abba,” which is translated as “father,” means “one who brings forth, or bears fruit” (“ibba” = fruit). This sense of the word is quite intelligible and its use legitimate enough. The Bible frequently makes use of the appellation “Father.” God, somewhere in the Bible, says: “Israel is my first-born son”; and elsewhere in the book of Job He is called “the father of the rain.” It is because of the abuse of this Divine Appellation of the Creator by Christendom that the Qur’an refrains from using it. From a purely Muslim point of belief the Christian dogma concerning the eternal birth or generation of the Son is a blasphemy.

Whether the Christian baptismal formula is authentic or spurious I believe there is a hidden truth in it. For it must be admitted that the Evangelists never authorize the use of it in any other ritual, prayer, or creed other than that of Baptism. This point is extremely important. St. John had foretold the Baptism with the Holy Spirit and fire by the Prophet Muhammad, as we saw in the preceding articles. The immediate Baptizer being God Himself, and the mediate the Son of Man or the Barnasha of the vision of Daniel, it was perfectly just and legitimate to mention those two names as the first and second efficient causes; and the name of the Holy Spirit, too, as the causa materialis of the Sibghatullah! Now the Divine Appellation “Father,” before its abuse by the Church, was rightly invoked. In fact, the Sibghatullah is a new birth, a nativity into the Kingdom of God which is Islam. The Baptizer who causes this regeneration is directly Allah. To be born in the religion if Islam, to be endowed with the faith in the true God, is the greatest favor and gift of the “Heavenly Father” – to use the evangelistic expression. In this respect God is infinitely more beneficent than an earthly father.

As regards the second name in the formula, “the Son,” one is at a loss to know who or what this “son” is? Whose son? If God is rightly addressed “Father,” then one is curious, inquisitive, and anxious to know which of His innumerable “sons” is intended in the baptismal formula. Jesus taught us to pray “Our Father who art in heaven.” If we are all His sons in the sense of His creatures, then the mention of the word “son” in the formula becomes somehow senseless and even ridiculous. We know that the name “the Son of Man” – or “Barnasha” – is mentioned eighty-three times in the discourses of Jesus. The Qur’an never calls Jesus “the son of man” but always “the son of Mary.” He could not call himself “the son of man” because he was only “the son of woman.” There is no getting away from the fact. You may make him “the son of God” as you do, but you can’t make him “the son of man” unless you believe him to be the offspring of Joseph or someone else, and consequently fasten on to him the taint of illegitimacy.

I don’t know exactly how, whether through intuition, inspiration, or dream, I am taught and convinced that the second name in the formula is an ill-fated corruption of “the Son of Man,” viz. the Barnasha of Daniel (vii.), and therefore Ahmad “the Periqlytos” (Paraclete) of St. John’s Gospel.

As to the Holy Spirit in the formula, it is not a person or an individual spirit, but an agency, force, energy of God with which a man is born or converted into the religion and knowledge of the One God.

2. – WHAT THE EARLY FATHERS OF THE NASARA (CHRISTIANITY) SAY ABOUT THE HOLY SPIRIT.

(a) Hermas (Similitude v. 5, 6) understands, by the “Holy Spirit,” the divine element in Christ, namely the Son created before all things. Without entering into the useless or rather meaningless discussion whether Hermas confounds the Holy Spirit with the Word, or if it is a distinct element belonging to Christ, it is admitted that the latter was created before all things – that is to say, in the beginning – and that the Spirit in Hermas’ belief is not a person.

(b) Justin – called the “Martyr” (100?-167? A.C.) – and Theophilus (120?-180? A.C.) understand by the Holy Spirit sometimes a peculiar form of the manifestation of the Word and sometimes a divine attribute, but never a divine person. It must be remembered that these two Greek fathers and writers of the second century A.C. had no definite knowledge and belief about the Holy Ghost of the Trinitarians of the fourth and the succeeding centuries.

(c) Athenagoras (110-180 A.C.) says the Holy Spirit is an emanation of God proceeding from and returning to Him like the rays of the sun (Deprecatio pro Christiarus, ix, x). Irenaeus (130?-202? A.C.) says that the Holy Spirit and the Son are two worshipers of God and that the angels submit to them. The wide difference between the belief and the conceptions of these two early fathers about the Holy Spirit is too obvious to need any further comment. It is surprising that the two worshipers of God, according to the declaration of such an authority as Irenaeus, should, two centuries afterwards, be raised to the dignity of God and proclaimed two divine persons in company with the one true God by whom they were created.

(d) The most illustrious and learned of all the ante-Nicene fathers and the Christian apologists was Origen (185-254 A C.). The author of the Hexepla ascribes personality to the Holy Spirit, but makes it a creature of the Son. The creation of the Holy Spirit by the Son cannot be even in the beginning when the Word – or the Son – was created by God.

The doctrine concerning this Holy Spirit was not sufficiently developed in 325 A.C., and therefore was not defined by the Council of Nicea. It was only in 386 A.C. at the second Ecumenical Council of Constantinople that it was declared to be the Third Person of the Trinity, consubstantial and coeval with the Father and the Son.

3. – The “Paraclete” does not signify either “consoler” or “advocate”; in truth, it is not a classical word at all. The Greek orthography of the word is Paraklytos which in ecclesiastical literature is made to mean “one called to aid, advocate, intercessor” (Dict. Grec.-Francais, by Alexandre). One need not profess to be a Greek scholar to know that the Greek word for “comforter or consoler” is not “Paraclytos” but “Paracalon”. I have no Greek version of the Septuagint with me, but I remember perfectly well that the Hebrew word for “comforter” (“mnahem”) in the Lamentations of Jeremiah (i. 2, 9, 16, 17, 21, etc.) is translated into Parakaloon, from the verb Parakaloo, which means to call to, invite, exhort, console, pray, invoke. It should be noticed that there is a long alpha vowel after the consonant kappa in the “Paracalon” which does not exist in the “Paraclytos.” In the phrase (He who consoles us in all our afflictions”) “paracalon” and not “paraclytos” is used. (“I exhort, or invite, thee to work”). Many other examples can be cited here.

There is another Greek word for comforter and consoler, i.e. “Parygorytys” from “I console.”

As to the other meaning of “intercessor or advocate” which is given in the ecclesiastical word “Paraclete,” I again insist that “Paracalon” and not “Paraclytos” can convey in itself a similar sense. The proper Greek term for “advocate” is Sunegorus and for “intercessor” or “mediator” Meditea.

In my next article I shall give the true Greek form of which Paraklytos is a corruption. En passant, I wish to correct an error into which the French savant Ernest Renan has also fallen. If I recollect well, Monsieur Renan, in his famous The Life of Christ, interprets the “Paraclete” of St John (xiv. 16, 26; xv. 7; 1 John ii. 1) as an “advocate.” He cites the Syro-Chaldean form “Peraklit” as opposed to “Ktighra” “the accuser” from Kategorus. The Syrian name for mediator or intercessor is “mis’aaya,” but in law courts the “Snighra” (from the Greek Sunegorus) is used for an advocate. Many Syrians unfamiliar with the Greek language consider the “Paraqlita” to be really the Aramaic or the Syriac form of the “Paraclete” in the Pshittha Version and to be composed of “Paraq,” “to save from, to deliver from,” and “lita” “the accursed.” The idea that Christ is the “Savior from the curse of the law,” and therefore he is himself too “Paraqlita” (1 John ii. 1), may have led some to think that the Greek word is originally an Aramaic word, just as the Greek sentence “Maran atha” in Aramaic is “Maran Athi,” i.e. “our Lord is coming” (1 John xvi. 22), which seems to be an expression among the believers regarding the coming of the Last Great Prophet. This ‘Maran Athi,” as well as, especially, the baptismal formula, contains points too important to be neglected. They both deserve a special study and a valuable exposition. They both embody in themselves marks and indications otherwise than favorable to Christianity.

I think I have sufficiently proved that the “Paraclytos,” from a linguistic and etymological point of view, does not mean “advocate, consoler, or comforter.” For centuries the ignorant Latins and Europeans have been writing the name of Prophet Muhammad “Mahomet,” that of Mushi “Moses.” Is it, therefore, small wonder that some sturdy Christian monk or scribe should have written the true name in the corrupted form of Paraklytos? The former means the “most Illustrious, Praiseworthy,” but the corrupted form means nothing at all except a standing shame to those who have for eighteen centuries understood it to signify an advocate or a consoler.

Retrieved from “http://www.articlesbase.com/religion-articles/the-paraclete-is-not-the-holy-spirit-4218368.html

(ArticlesBase SC #4218368)

Start increasing your traffic today just by submitting articles with us, click here to get started.
Liked this article? Click here to publish it on your website or blog, it’s free and easy!

The Islam Show
About the Author:

Nasir Pasha, 36 Years, B.E Electrical and Electronic, Loving Father, Husband, Author, Thinker, Reader, strongly believe peace is the only way to solve all problems of the world.

]]>

Questions and Answers

Ask our experts your Religion related questions here…

Ask

200 Characters left

What are the gifts of the holy spirit wikianswers ?
What are the gifts of the holy spirit catholic ?
What are the gifts of the holy spirit for kids ?

Rate this Article

1
2
3
4
5

vote(s)
0 vote(s)

Feedback
RSS
Print
Email
Re-Publish

Source:  http://www.articlesbase.com/religion-articles/the-paraclete-is-not-the-holy-spirit-4218368.html

Article Tags:
allah, quran muhammad, the paraclete is not the holy spirit, islam prophet, honey bee, abdomen, healing power, jesus, christianity, jews, moses, arab, dubai, india, usa, twitter, face book, science

Related Videos

Latest Religion Articles
More from The Islam Show


CNET Loaded Holiness in 3D

GoDaddy joins Google in the fight against Chinese censorship, Gmail will help you identify malicious e-mail, and the latest player in the 3D space is God via CatholicTV. (03:41)


Holy Invasion of Privacy, Badman! W.D.I.D.to.D.T? Gameplay

All of humanity is your enemy! The god of destruction needs to keep his minnions safe. Take the role and build a delicously devious cave full of monsters to stop their crusade in Nippon Ichi Software’s dungeon simulation Holy Invasion of Privacy, Badman! (01:04)


How to Get the Godly Possessions in God of War III

In this edition of Cheat, Kristin Adams gives you tips and tricks for finding some of The Godly Possessions in PlayStation 3 exclusive, God of War III. (02:19)


God of War Collection Debut Trailer

God of War and God of War II, two of the greatest action games of all time, are remastered for the first time ever to be played in high-def Playstation 3 glory. (02:06)


How to Beat Poseidon In God of War III

The Sea God Poseidon is one mighty foe to take on by yourself… that is of course, if you weren’t Kratos, the God of War. Check out this cheat walkthrough video on how to beat Poseidon in God of War 3. (06:27)

Daily divine digest

The search for reality is inborn in man. Ceaselessly it is going on. Geographical limitation and traditional upbringing are no barriers to it. The quest would stop only with the attainment of union with Reality.
Vedanta philosophy is the systematic exposition of reality positing itself in three features. The absolute reality or nirguna brahman is the basic feature. It admits realisation but defies verbal definition. The transcendent reality, or Iswara or Saguna Brahman is the next feature.

By:
chakravarthyl

Spirituality>
Religionl
Apr 19, 2011

A mother’s letter to her dear children

The truth is best as it is. No one can alter it, neither can anyone improve it. Have faith in the truth and live it. Now you will ask, what is this mysterious truth? To know that you are infinite is truth. To find that you must always begin with yourself.

By:
chakravarthyl

Spirituality>
Religionl
Apr 18, 2011

Making the right choice has never been easy

While it is not necessary that everyone who chooses love over hate will have an Oscar moment, the import of what A.R. Rahman stated in his acceptance speech at the Oscars in 2008 is one that perhaps merits a few minutes of reflection: “All my life I have had the choice between love and hate, and I have chosen love…And I am here”.

By:
chakravarthyl

Spirituality>
Religionl
Apr 18, 2011

The Best Way To Locate Trusted Prophetic Ministries

How To Find Trusted Prophetic Ministries This is a day and age in which Prophetic Ministries abound. On street corners, bus stations, radio, television and thousands of churches nationwide there are men and women who are claiming that the words they are saying come from the Lord.

By:
Catalyst R.O.I.l

Spirituality>
Religionl
Apr 18, 2011

Does Humanity Believe in God Because of Fear?

The perception that is held by most people is that God is sovereign and he rules over the mankind. There is a strong belief that all the creations are ruled by God and they should therefore adore, honor and worship him. The above ideas are not something that we can decide to do or not but God demands that we must do them because He rightfully deserves worship, honor, respect and adoration.

By:
Henryl

Spirituality>
Religionl
Apr 18, 2011

Vishukkani orungukayayi…

Vishu is one of the important festivals among the Hindus of Kerala. It is celebrated in the month of April each year, usually on the 14th. This year it happens to be on April 15th, 2010. According to the traditional Malayalam calendar, Vishu falls on the 1st day of the month of Medam of the New Year. In every household and in the temples of Kerala, traditional rituals are followed to usher in yet another year of health, success and good luck.

By:
keralatravelsl

Spirituality>
Religionl
Apr 18, 2011

The Quintessence of Islam

Belief in God, in Angels, in the revealed Books of God, in God’s many Prophets, in a life after death, and in the Divine measurement of human affairs coupled with declaration of Faith and the five fundamentals principles of Islam are quintessence of Islam.

By:
Dr.Badruddin Khanl

Spirituality>
Religionl
Apr 17, 2011

Meditative Prayer

If you’re truly good at meditation, you definitely will soon spot the little differences in your attitude along with attitude. One of several areas that will be impacted is your mood. Annoyance is normally a manifestation of disappointment that matters may not be moving about your path.

By:
Rev. Bossol

Spirituality>
Religionl
Apr 17, 2011

The Natural Blood of Women

However, she may recited from her memory without touching the Quran. As for the sexually defiled person, he/she may not ever recite the Quran from memory or touch the mushaf until he/she makes ghusl. The difference between the two is that amount of time one is sexually defiled is very short as he may make ghusl as soon as he has done the act with his spouse. The amount of time is not long and he is in control of its length as he may make ghusl whenever he wishes. Even if he cannot find water, .

By:
The Islam Showl

Spirituality>
Religionl
Feb 16, 2011

Men are the Protectors and Maintainers of Women

Allah says: “Men are the protectors and maintainers of women because of what Allah has preferred one with over the other and because of what they spend to support them from their wealth.” [Sûrah an-Nisâ': 34]

By:
The Islam Showl

Spirituality>
Religionl
Feb 16, 2011

Have you Talked with Your Child Today?

Have you had a meaningful conversation together? Do you know what your child accomplished today, how he may be feeling, whether or not he has any concerns? Does your child know that you care about him?

By:
The Islam Showl

Spirituality>
Religionl
Feb 16, 2011

Beauty Queens Outside and Slobs Inside?

In the West women dress with looks to kill outside the home and save the sweats and t-shirts for inside. Most women will look very beautiful while going outside of the house, but look like a slob inside the house. The one of them spends at least an hour taking a shower in the morning, putting on makeup, fixing her hair, and making sure she will look snazzy and smell pleasant when she steps out the door.

By:
The Islam Showl
News and Societyl
Feb 16, 2011

Are Women Crooked by Nature?

Abu Huraira [ ra ] narrated that the Prophet [ saw ] said: “The woman was created from a rib. She will not be straight according to your way. If you want to enjoy her, you will have to enjoy her with her twist [crookedness ]and if you try to straighten her, you would break her: and breaking her is divorcing her

By:
The Islam Showl
Home and Familyl
Feb 16, 2011

Unity Among Western Muslim Communities

I think I better start by giving you the characteristics of the ideal Muslim community, as far as unity is concerned. And the ideal Muslim community is, of course, that of the Companions of the Prophet sallallaahu `alaihi wa sallam. So if we aspire to be united we should have that ideal in our mind. We might never attain to that high level, but we should at least keep it as a goal, and as a criterion by which we judge how far towards the unity we have gone. The community of the Companions of …

By:
The Islam Showl
News and Societyl
Feb 16, 2011

How Can the Muslim Discipline One’s Self?

Acknowledging your shortcomings is one of the first steps in disciplining yourself. Whoever acknowledges that he has shortcomings has started on the path to self-discipline. This acknowledgement is one of the things that make us discipline ourselves and be persistent in doing so. This acknowledgement should not put you off disciplining yourself. It is a sign of Allah’s care when a person tries to change himself and develop, as Allah says

By:
The Islam Showl
Home and Familyl
Feb 16, 2011

THE GOOD SHEPHERDS : Choosing the Correct Path for Our Children

It is narrated that a man came to a knowledgeable person from among our pious predecessors and asked him, “I just had a child, what should I do?” The answer came, “If you are just now asking this question, then you have already lost.”

By:
The Islam Showl
Home and Familyl
Feb 16, 2011

Add new Comment

Your Name: *

Your Email:

Comment Body: *

 

Verification code:*

* Required fields

Submit

Your Articles Here
It’s Free and easy

Sign Up Today


Author Navigation

My Home
Publish Article
View/Edit Articles
View/Edit Q&A
Edit your Account
Manage Authors
Statistics Page
Personal RSS Builder
My Home
Edit your Account
Update Profile
View/Edit Q&A
Publish Article
Author Box


The Islam Show has 289 articles online

Contact Author

Subscribe to RSS

Print article

Send to friend

Re-Publish article

Articles Categories
All Categories

Advertising
Arts & Entertainment
Automotive
Beauty
Business
Careers
Computers
Education
Finance
Food and Beverage
Health
Hobbies
Home and Family
Home Improvement
Internet
Law
Marketing
News and Society
Relationships
Self Improvement
Shopping
Spirituality
Sports and Fitness
Technology
Travel
Writing

Spirituality

Astrology
Christianity
Feng Shui
Graphology
Judaism
Kabbalah
Meditation
Metaphysics
Mysticism
New Age
Numerology
Reiki
Religion
Tarot

]]>

Need Help?
Contact Us
FAQ
Submit Articles
Editorial Guidelines
Blog

Site Links
Recent Articles
Top Authors
Top Articles
Find Articles
Site Map
Mobile Version

Webmasters
RSS Builder
RSS
Link to Us

Business Info
Advertising

Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy | User published content is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Copyright © 2005-2011 Free Articles by ArticlesBase.com, All rights reserved.

Nasir Pasha, 36 Years, B.E Electrical and

Be Sociable, Share!

Tagged with:

Filed under: Christian Speakers

Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!